Anteros

The Sec declared, in consternation,

"PTomic has no secure foundation.

I've realised something horrific:

The Ruleset is very specific

About the way votes should be cast,

But many times in the Game's past

Posts meant as votes, and treated so,

Weren't actually valid. Oh no!

If one Player, even dsyst,

On legalism should insist

The whole game could just fall apart.

We'd have to go back to the start

And recount votes for ev'ry Move.

Some outcomes different might prove,

Which could effect each Player's score.

I might not be Sec any more!

The whole Game might be proved illegal!

We're doomeder than a smoking beagle!"

Deced proposed a Rule (to be

Effective retroactively)

To focus on voter intent:

"As long as it's clear what was meant

We don't need a specific word

To make a vote count. That's absurd."

One vote against. In favour, four

(But one of them did not say 'for',

Which meant it wasn't valid yet.

Is that ironic, Morissette?)